Enterprise Architect has a long and proven track record in a wide range of industries across more than 160 countries. For 15 years it has been continually developed, enhanced and refined to meet the emerging needs of programmers, business analysts, enterprise architects, testers, project managers, designers and others. Based on open standards and proven best-practice, Enterprise Architect can comfortably scale from small single user models to large team based repositories and even to globally distributed Cloud based solutions.
Sparx Enterprise Architect 10 Torrent
Enterprise architecture (EA) tools allow organizations to examine both the need for and the impact of change. They capture the interrelationships and interdependencies within and between an ecosystem of partners, operating models, capabilities, people, processes, information, and applications and technologies. They provide a central repository to capture data and metadata about the artifacts that an enterprise cares about and their related life cycles. Models represent the relationships between these artifacts and are themselves treated as assets that help describe and shape the future of the enterprise. EA tools help with investment decisions for both IT and the broader enterprise. When models are combined with operational performance data, they can help improve business outcomes and shape the construction and ongoing development of digital platforms.
My overall experience with ADOIT has been positive. The product was used as part of a university course on Enterprise Architecture (EA) that I took as a student and later (1 year ago) taught as a lecturer. The deployment objective of the product was to provide a tool for modeling interconnected enterprise architectures, including visualizations and analyses. ADOIT helped in achieving this goal by being easy to use while still providing all the necessary capabilities and functionalities for EA modeling. In terms of support, ADOIT was excellent. We were provided with an administrative license in advance, which also included already established student group accesses according to the students registered for the course. No technical issues have come up yet. Additional help was rarely needed, but if it was, a corresponding solution was always provided immediately. One of the pros of ADOIT is the ease of use and the variety of advanced functionalities available. However, I have not measured the ROI (no investment needed from my side) or quantified any productivity enhancements based on my experience. In summary, my experience with ADOIT has been positive, and I found the product to be an effective tool for modeling interconnected enterprise architectures. The support and service provided by ADOIT were also excellent.
Dragon1 is one of the best online platforms which enables an individual or organizations to perform enterprise transformation through an online platform. Also, the UI is quite unique (compared to similar solutions available) and it gives a visual and effective way, to adapt constantly to new technologies.It is trusted by many brands globally as an enterprise architecture management solution. It helps you reshape the organization into a digital ecosystem.
When we come to choosing enterprise architect solution, there are so many option software's in the market and finding the right solution might a tedious process. In my our case we find QPR Enterprise to be the best fit as it is resourceful, appealing for viewer and highly interactive for users.
ER/Studio is the leading business-driven data architecture solution. It combines multiple-platform data modeling, business process modeling, and enterprise metadata for organizations of any size. With ER/Studio, you can:
Enterprise architecture (EA) is a business function concerned with the structures and behaviors of a business, especially business roles and processes that create and use business data. An Enterprise Architect is at the top level of the architect hierarchy. This means they have more responsibilities than solutions architects. While solutions architects focus on their solution, an enterprise architect focuses on the overview of the whole organization. An enterprise architect leads over many solutions architects and business functions. By international consensus, Enterprise Architecture has been defined as "a well-defined practice for conducting enterprise analysis, design, planning, and implementation, using a comprehensive approach at all times, for the successful development and execution of strategy. Enterprise architecture applies architecture principles and practices to guide organizations through the business, information, process, and technology changes necessary to execute their strategies. These practices utilize the various aspects of an enterprise to identify, motivate, and achieve these changes."[1]
Enterprise architecture (EA) is a discipline for proactively and holistically leading enterprise responses to disruptive forces by identifying and analyzing the execution of change toward desired business vision and outcomes. EA delivers value by presenting business and IT leaders with signature-ready recommendations for adjusting policies and projects to achieve target business outcomes that capitalize on relevant business disruptions. EA is used to steer decision making toward the evolution of the future state architecture.[3]
Perspectives, or beliefs, held by enterprise architecture practitioners and scholars, with regards to the meaning of the enterprise architecture, typically gravitate towards one or a hybrid of three schools of thought:[7]
According to the standard ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010,[6] the product used to describe the architecture of a system is called an architectural description. In practice, an architectural description contains a variety of lists, tables, and diagrams. These are models known as views. In the case of enterprise architecture, these models describe the logical business functions or capabilities, business processes, human roles and actors, the physical organization structure, data flows and data stores, business applications and platform applications, hardware, and communications infrastructure.[8]
Paramount to changing the enterprise architecture is the identification of a sponsor. His/her mission, vision, and strategy, and the governance framework define all roles, responsibilities, and relationships involved in the anticipated transformation. Changes considered by enterprise architects typically include:
A methodology for developing and using architecture to guide the transformation of a business from a baseline state to a target state, sometimes through several transition states, is usually known as an enterprise architecture framework. A framework provides a structured collection of processes, techniques, artifact descriptions, reference models, and guidance for the production and use of an enterprise-specific architecture description.
The benefits of enterprise architecture are achieved through its direct and indirect contributions to organizational goals. It has been found that the most notable benefits of enterprise architecture can be observed in the following areas:[10]
Companies such as Independence Blue Cross, Intel, Volkswagen AG[24] and InterContinental Hotels Group use enterprise architecture to improve their business architectures as well as to improve business performance and productivity.
For various understandable reasons, commercial organizations rarely publish substantial enterprise architecture descriptions. However, government agencies have begun to publish architectural descriptions they have developed. Examples include:
Establishing enterprise architecture, as accepted, recognized, functionally integrated and fully involved concept at operational and tactical levels is identified as one of the biggest challenges facing Enterprise Architects today and one of the main reasons why many EA-Initiatives fail.[26]
Despite the benefits that enterprise architecture claims to provide, for more than a decade, writers and organizations raised concerns about enterprise architecture as an effective practice. Here is a partial list of those objections:
According to the Federation of Enterprise Architecture Professional Organizations (FEAPO), enterprise architecture interacts with a wide array of other disciplines commonly found in business settings. According to FEAPO:
As enterprise architecture has emerged in various organizations, the broad reach has resulted in this business role being included in the information technology governance processes of many organizations. While this may imply that enterprise architecture is closely tied to IT, it should be viewed in the broader context of business optimization in that it addresses business architecture, performance management, and process architecture, as well as more technical subjects.
Discussions of the intersection of enterprise architecture and various IT practices have been published by various IT analysis firms. Gartner and Forrester have stressed the important relationship of enterprise architecture with emerging holistic design practices such as Design Thinking and User Experience Design.[34][35][36] Analyst firm Real Story Group suggested that enterprise architecture and the emerging concept of the digital workplace were "two sides to the same coin."[37] The Cutter Consortium describes enterprise architecture as an information and knowledge-based discipline.[38]
The enterprise architecture of an organization is too complex and extensive to document in its entirety, so knowledge management techniques provide a way to explore and analyze these hidden, tacit, or implicit areas. In return, enterprise architecture provides a way of documenting the components of an organization and their interaction, in a systemic and holistic way that complements knowledge management.[39]
In various venues,[40] enterprise architecture has been discussed as having a relationship with Service Oriented Architecture, a particular style of application integration. Research points to enterprise architecture promoting the use of SOA as an enterprise-wide integration pattern.[41][42] 2ff7e9595c
Comments